From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lim_data too narrow Date: 04 Jan 2004 14:53:35 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200312180058.hBI0wtaq054209@bigtex.jrv.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1073246116 4192 80.91.224.253 (4 Jan 2004 19:55:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:55:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: james@jrv.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 04 20:55:08 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AdEL6-00051p-00 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 20:55:08 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AdEL5-0003zA-00 for ; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 20:55:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AdFII-0003aW-Or for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:56:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AdFHh-0003TY-8C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AdFH8-0003HX-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:55:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AdFH7-0003Gw-UZ; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from asado.iro.umontreal.ca (asado.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.24.84]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6E420F74; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:53:36 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by asado.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 02B7D8C6F3; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:53:35 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=0, requis 5) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18991 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18991 >> It would seem that on a 64-bit machine, lim_data should >> be a 64-bit type. Is there any agreement on how to >> specify such a type in C? > Modern compilers should support the int64_t type (it is mandated by > the new C99 standard and should be defined on stdint.h). Wouldn't something like size_t be preferable? Stefan