From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch: Syntax and Hard Newlines Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:52:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164898407 3240 80.91.229.2 (30 Nov 2006 14:53:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 30 15:53:24 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpnHd-0001ox-MU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:53:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpnHd-0003GE-8S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:53:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GpnH5-0002uj-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GpnH1-0002qA-Tx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:52:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpnH1-0002pe-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.188] (helo=tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GpnH0-0004fx-Ad; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:52:26 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.53.194.10]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20061130145224.CBEC6280.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:52:24 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7CF6F95EE; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:52:24 -0500 (EST) Original-To: "Herbert Euler" In-Reply-To: (Herbert Euler's message of "Thu\, 30 Nov 2006 14\:36\:08 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63138 Archived-At: > If all filling functions insert soft newlines with `fill-newline', > changing this function will be Ok. And if making this change is Ok, > how about adding a customizable variable to control whether putting > the `syntax-table' property? This would require as little functions > to be changed as possible. I think it's the right idea. But we need to make auto-fill-mode (i.e. comment-indent-new-line) use fill-newline. Stefan