From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RFC: status icon support Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:25:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200801120157.m0C1v6WL020654@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <85r6gn5lr0.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85ir1z5ksh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <8563xz5dpn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200277644 23182 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2008 02:27:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, schwab@suse.de, dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 14 03:27:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JEF39-0002hr-1a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 03:27:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JEF2k-00078k-LL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:27:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEF1R-0005w1-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:25:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JEF1P-0005tr-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:25:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JEF1P-0005tb-FU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:25:55 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JEF1I-0006Mf-HP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:25:48 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAMpWikfO+KVp/2dsb2JhbACmVX0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,279,1196658000"; d="scan'208";a="12623927" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2008 21:25:46 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.165.105]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id UDN79646; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:25:46 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 19CE68124; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:25:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:00:58 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86871 Archived-At: > The reason I prefer K&R style in function definitions is that the > argument type declarations are easier to read when not inside the > parentheses. That is simply not so. You may find them easier to read, but I find them harder to read instead. I suspect it has to do with habit. Stefan