From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: multi-threaded Emacs Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:09:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87abbiody1.fsf@master.homenet> <877i6l5d8s.fsf@master.homenet> <87prkcetze.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228086588 388 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2008 23:09:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Giuseppe Scrivano , rms@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 01 00:10:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L6vR3-0002dK-Mw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:10:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51092 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6vPt-0007iv-Jx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:09:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6vPp-0007hN-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L6vPp-0007fZ-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48713 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L6vPo-0007fO-VQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:57184) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L6vPk-000303-Md; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:09:20 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtgEAGOrMknO+Jkl/2dsb2JhbACBbcp5gn2BJA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,691,1220241600"; d="scan'208";a="30454101" Original-Received: from 206-248-153-37.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.153.37]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 30 Nov 2008 18:09:19 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6CA6384C0; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:09:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87prkcetze.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:20:37 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106349 Archived-At: > IIRC, the basic consensus was that some sort of explicitly > non-preemptive threading was probably the best solution for emacs. At least as a first step, yes. Stefan