From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest, and branching plans Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4B8147A9.7030504@gmail.com> <87ljemdzxo.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4B83682D.5010804@gnu.org> <4B9B0211.9070308@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268505042 8257 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2010 18:30:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Christoph Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 19:30:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqW6f-0000QK-AM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:30:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59362 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqW6e-00072B-Lx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NqW6a-00071O-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49636 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqW6Z-000705-0r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqW6X-0000D2-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:30 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:8719 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqW6X-0000Cy-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:29 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAP9nm0tLd+SL/2dsb2JhbACacHS5L4R7BIMYh3U X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,633,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="58182411" Original-Received: from 75-119-228-139.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([75.119.228.139]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2010 13:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 742C5B423D; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4B9B0211.9070308@gmail.com> (Christoph's message of "Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:10:09 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121911 Archived-At: > Would it make sense to create a 'make package-install' target that omits > these things (if there is other stuff besides the shortcut, that is more > intended for a real installation rather than packaging)? When I am packaging > I don't want the shortcut created. To me at least, the name "package-install" would not be helpful. Something like "install_files_only" would sound more meaningful (or "install_for_packaging", or ...). Stefan