From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6248: 23.1; justify (esc q) broken in Latex mode Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:41:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275663281 6654 80.91.229.12 (4 Jun 2010 14:54:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 14:54:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6248@debbugs.gnu.org To: mark.lillibridge@hp.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 04 16:54:39 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKYHn-0006OT-6W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 16:54:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41031 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKYHg-0008L0-U6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39890 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKXPY-0008IV-6U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:58:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKXPG-00086t-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKXPG-00086o-7J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:57:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKX9u-00019N-9k; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6248 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6248-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6248.12756588724409 (code B ref 6248); Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6248) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2010 13:41:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKX95-000194-Vf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:41:12 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKX94-00018y-9e for 6248@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:41:10 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao0FAIefCEzO+K4b/2dsb2JhbACSKIwXcr8/hRcEjF8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,361,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="67293578" Original-Received: from 206-248-174-27.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.174.27]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 04 Jun 2010 09:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D876F81F8; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:41:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Mark Lillibridge's message of "Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:02:06 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:42:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37538 Archived-At: >> Hmm... I see some problems with that: >> - your original message reported that the whole paragraph was indented >> (apparently by 4 spaces), so either that paragraph was not "outside >> of any environment" or there is something I don't understand. > I think there is something else going on; that paragraph was > contained in absolutely no environment. As an experiment, I indented > the first line only of the original paragraph by 20 spaces. The result > was that the entire paragraph is indented 20 spaces. I can't think of > any argument for why this makes sense. Oh, I see what's going on: the filling only reindents the lines after the first (i.e. only the lines that come after a newline inserted by the filling code), and the filling code simply trusts the first line to be properly indented. Stefan