From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rmail and the raw-text coding system Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:05:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295316328 30371 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2011 02:05:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: mark.lillibridge@hp.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 18 03:05:24 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pf0wl-0004P2-61 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:05:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60189 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pf0wk-000820-Fn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:05:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51068 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pf0wf-00081h-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pf0wf-00016o-3F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:05:17 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:38681 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pf0we-00016e-UQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:05:17 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhwHAJKENE1FpZbF/2dsb2JhbACWPY4XdMFchVAEhG+ONg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,336,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="88350203" Original-Received: from 69-165-150-197.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.150.197]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Jan 2011 21:05:15 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9FE63660DC; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:05:15 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Mark Lillibridge's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:31:07 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134680 Archived-At: >> But AFAIK BABYL files use a single encoding for the whole file, and >> since around Emacs-21.x that single encoding is supposed to be >> emacs-mule (and I seem to remember that the BABYL file is supposed to >> contain an annotation at the very beginning saying it's using >> emacs-mule, if so). > Arguably, it is a Rmail 22 bug that some BABYL files are encoded > using raw-text. So you're saying that when Emacs-22 wrote those files, it used raw-text? And that Emacs-22's Rmail reads those files properly? And that Emacs-22's Rmail reads those files with raw-text? Stefan