From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8626: 24.0.50; (elisp) Region to Fontify after a Buffer Change - Why a child of Multiline Font Lock? Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 10:46:03 -0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304689636 25040 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2011 13:47:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 13:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8626@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 06 15:47:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QILN5-00081O-IU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 15:47:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43542 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QILN5-0003BP-3W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46497) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QILN2-0003B7-1f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QILN1-0003sC-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QILN0-0003s7-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QILN0-00040F-Dv; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 13:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8626.130468957515329 (code B ref 8626); Fri, 06 May 2011 13:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2011 13:46:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QILME-0003zB-Uc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QILMC-0003yx-TX for 8626@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:46:13 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:40980 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QILM7-0006cr-5j; Fri, 06 May 2011 09:46:07 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BFE6766168; Fri, 6 May 2011 10:46:03 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 5 May 2011 15:21:37 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 09:47:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46269 Archived-At: > Subject line says it all. This node says zero about multiline font > lock. No apparent relation between the two. If there is a relation, > then it needs to be pointed out. I'm not sure what more you need. It already says: When a buffer is changed, the region that Font Lock refontifies is by default the smallest sequence of whole lines that spans the change. While this works well most of the time, sometimes it doesn't---for example, when a change alters the syntactic meaning of text on an earlier line. -- Stefan