From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9598: 24.0.50; completion goes too far Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:45:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317005191 5343 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2011 02:46:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9598@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 26 04:46:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R81D8-0002ae-RV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 04:46:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37793 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R81D8-0001OE-0a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:46:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37178) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R81D4-0001NO-LP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:46:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R81D3-0003Lr-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:46:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R81D3-0003Ln-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:46:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R81Dh-0002Md-Sd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9598 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9598-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9598.13170051949037 (code B ref 9598); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9598) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2011 02:46:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R81DG-0002Lg-Dc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:46:34 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R81DE-0002LW-EI; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:46:33 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApcHABLmf05FpZLc/2dsb2JhbABBmT6OP3mBUwEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNiC+4OIcLBKBehEM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,441,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="138478020" Original-Received: from 69-165-146-220.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.146.220]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 25 Sep 2011 22:45:50 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 16558660B6; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:45:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 25 Sep 2011 13:34:13 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:47:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51855 Archived-At: retitle 9598 C-x b completion should also display current buffer. thanks > When in the *mail* buffer, I found that C-x b *ma TAB offered me [...] > and did not mention *mail* at all. That's on purpose: C-x b is about moving to another buffer, so it explicitly excludes the current buffer. > And the current buffer should not be excluded from a completion list, > when a completion list is displayed. It's somewhat difficult to distinguish the "all-completions for display" case from the "all-completions for completion" in the existing completion framework. But I'll see how we can get that behavior. Stefan