From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9653: 24.0.50; `ucs-names' - Why all of the ("" . XXX) entries? Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <74B14D2A03144E798C9415172D5FE01A@us.oracle.com> <83sjn6gfr6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317934622 16706 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2011 20:57:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 20:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9653@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 22:56:57 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuzw-0000Yf-5V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:56:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47672 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuzv-0007AW-HD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuzt-00079R-B1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuzs-00053O-3Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuzs-00053K-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBv02-0007w1-A6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9653 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9653-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9653.131793458930461 (code B ref 9653); Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9653) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2011 20:56:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuzU-0007vE-2H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:29 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBuzR-0007uz-G8 for 9653@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:26 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwKALMUjk7O+JxS/2dsb2JhbABCmQ2PJYEGgVMBAQQBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIEbhchywEoQyERA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,498,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="140195732" Original-Received: from 206-248-156-82.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.156.82]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Oct 2011 16:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id ABAB4663BE; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 16:56:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83sjn6gfr6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 06 Oct 2011 20:02:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:57:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52316 Archived-At: > I asked for some reasoning, but you didn't provide any. Fine. But > should we now change the `iso-10646-comment' property to be nil when > it doesn't exist? Currently, any string attribute is returned as "" > if the attribute is not defined in the Unicode database. As a general rule, yes. Stefan