From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Common Lisp indentation bug fix/new feature Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:57:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321973861 16459 80.91.229.12 (22 Nov 2011 14:57:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:57:41 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 15:57:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrn0-0007VL-2k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:57:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37404 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrmx-0006Px-AN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:57:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrmr-0006PG-Gm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrmq-0005mv-8k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:57:29 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:45282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSrmp-0005mh-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:57:28 -0500 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pAMEvPU2002680; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:57:26 -0500 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C44F3B4043; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:57:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:26:56 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4048=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <4048> : streams <703816> : uri <1013196> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:146144 Archived-At: > So would it be OK to apply this, or is it too new-featurish? I kinda > think it fixes an indentation bug... I think it's a good change, but I don't think there's any rush to put it into Emacs-24.1. Stefan