From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-24 r108098: * admin/bzrmerge.el (bzrmerge-resolve): Disable local eval:. Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:29:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344630613 1019 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2012 20:30:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 10 22:30:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SzvqQ-0005A4-KD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:30:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34585 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzvqP-0002GF-EJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzvqL-0002Ey-EG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzvqI-0002bP-Rt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:30:01 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:59351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SzvqH-0002b7-Aq; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:29:57 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q7AKTua4024020; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 55DFDB4177; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 16:29:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:51:59 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4306=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4306> : streams <797298> : uri <1189162> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152419 Archived-At: >>> - (with-current-buffer (let ((enable-local-variables :safe)) >>> + (with-current-buffer (let ((enable-local-variables :safe) >>> + (enable-local-eval nil)) >> Why are those changes needed? > Paranoia. >> Shouldn't (enable-local-variables :safe) be sufficient? > Yes. Unless there is another screw-up like > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12155 > BTW, there have been zero other comments on that. Emacs releases have > happened in similar cases in the past, IIUC. I had the impression that it only affects unusual configurations. Stefan