From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] --exclude-vcs for multi-file archives? Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:58:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <8738g2i0sx.fsf@fx.delysid.org> <87lhtt9900.fsf@fx.delysid.org> <87d2f569e1.fsf@fx.delysid.org> <87wqdd7n2q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400806756 6380 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2014 00:59:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 00:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 23 02:59:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WndpF-0002tt-6H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 02:59:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40369 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WndpE-0003fg-SH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 20:59:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wndp1-0003Vv-1J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 20:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wndov-0001lG-5E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 20:58:54 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:5352) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wndoo-0001kr-VP; Thu, 22 May 2014 20:58:43 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYGAIDvNVPO+KQe/2dsb2JhbABZgwY7gw/APYEXF3SCJQEBAQECAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4AQOaAY8YgWqDTCE X-IPAS-Result: ArYGAIDvNVPO+KQe/2dsb2JhbABZgwY7gw/APYEXF3SCJQEBAQECAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4AQOaAY8YgWqDTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="63795133" Original-Received: from 206-248-164-30.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([206.248.164.30]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 May 2014 20:58:40 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A9F66AE0D2; Thu, 22 May 2014 20:58:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87wqdd7n2q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 22 May 2014 19:14:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172038 Archived-At: > If it isn't supported, it should be removed, right? The alternative (based on update-archive.sh) requires a more complex setup, which is why I didn't remove "make archive" altogether. But yes, it should be removed since it doesn't faithfully produce the packages that the scripts in elpa.gnu.org will produce. Stefan