From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't complain about changed file when it hasn't changed Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:06:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83oa4bbq5b.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8funuqw.fsf@gnu.org> <83twe2mdpu.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9a2mabl.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1472726592 31304 195.159.176.226 (1 Sep 2016 10:43:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 10:43:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 01 12:43:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPSb-0007c8-MN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 12:43:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36156 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPSc-0002kY-MV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:43:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPH6-0008VD-O9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPGz-0005RI-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=51154 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bfPGz-0005R7-EH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:31:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1benPD-0002ww-2f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:05:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:uUQIQSfap+QzzppTX6gnp7TfQxQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207054 Archived-At: >> So if you want to "update the doc" here, we'd have to actually state >> what the standard definition does (we currently don't do actually that). > ... indeed we should state that, because otherwise a naïve user will > not understand how come she lost this nice feature by just replacing a > function that is supposed to ask a question and be done. OK, I can do that. Of course, this begs another question: should the new test be in ask-user-about-supersession-threat or in its caller? I placed it in ask-user-about-supersession-threat for no very good reason (tho I don't see any strong reasons to move it to the caller either). Stefan