From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall? Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:46:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lgykci0z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fuosdq85.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474573139 28427 195.159.176.226 (22 Sep 2016 19:38:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:38:59 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 21:38:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bn9pS-0005Yc-57 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:38:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58801 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn9pQ-0002Xt-DK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:38:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn81B-0004O7-IV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:42:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn816-0003cF-AO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:42:41 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:52135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bn816-0003c7-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u8MHhNrS013055; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id CEB9F6024A; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:46:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87fuosdq85.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:22:02 +0200") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5805=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5805> : inlines <5262> : streams <1704808> : uri <2293960> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207710 Archived-At: > IIRC, it was not the case in older Emacsen and/or XEmacs. If `functionp' > behaves this way since Emacs 23, Tramp could remove the check for > `subrp', indeed. I do remember changing `functionp` at some point, but at least in Emacs-21.4 (functionp (symbol-function '+)) returns non-nil. >> IOW, if there's a kind of situation that recurs often enough to warrant >> something like (tramp-)compat-funcall you should report this as a bug. > `tramp-compat-funcall' is almost used for backward compatibility. > Who shall be the target of a bug report then? M-x report-emacs-bug. Stefan