From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: git history tracking across renames (and emacs support) Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 22:51:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <838tdiet25.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3li4vh7.fsf@telefonica.net> <87efnan46u.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <86wp12qtgo.fsf@dod.no> <83tvw6chqv.fsf@gnu.org> <86shbprix7.fsf_-_@dod.no> <83608kck4c.fsf@gnu.org> <544c170f-99bd-c701-3063-c697296a30a6@cs.ucla.edu> <83po6rar9c.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9mabwks.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv1ubrlu.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgheb8n8.fsf@gnu.org> <4d72cd67-58b1-ebaa-0ab3-13bee9a4beee@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1515124241 32376 195.159.176.226 (5 Jan 2018 03:50:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 03:50:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 05 04:50:37 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXJ1W-0007RP-N4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 04:50:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41027 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXJ3U-0004S3-Gr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 22:52:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36583) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXJ2o-0004RU-2Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 22:51:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXJ2k-0002cU-Ix for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 22:51:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=34233 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eXJ2j-0002Zn-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 22:51:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eXJ0U-0003DP-H5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2018 04:49:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:j7vj4ttA/dY9qqIsjGVHL/jrpUM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:221606 Archived-At: > IME, the vc-annotate buffer is a bit more helpful. Yes, it lists cosmetic > changes, but you can jump over them with 'a'. Interesting. I find vc-annotate so frustrating compared to vc-region-history that I tend to forget that some people may have a different experience. > Unlike the region history, where you're going to have to scroll through all > commits that have ever touched any part of the function (if you selected the > whole function, like you're recommending; but otherwise, you risk missing > relevant changes, I think). Usually I just select a handful of lines (rarely a whole function,unless its small). Stefan