From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: State of the overlay tree branch? Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:13:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <834lldp18f.fsf@gnu.org> <9646341d-700b-4240-216b-8c0e753fa79f@arkona-technologies.de> <86d03e78-9984-f33e-a3f3-3faa4b34d78b@arkona-technologies.de> <83vadso9ad.fsf@gnu.org> <5155d5e2-6b5c-581e-89fe-4f3af717304f@arkona-technologies.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521472506 26096 195.159.176.226 (19 Mar 2018 15:15:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:15:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 19 16:15:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1exwV4-0006gc-3X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:15:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42495 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exwX7-0008VK-95 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56211) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exwUD-0006gL-Mk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:14:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exwUA-0001yd-H0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=38119 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exwUA-0001xA-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1exwS5-00037W-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 16:11:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:9AKje7OYssk6ZhtQVaiJ/Zz9m/Q= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223820 Archived-At: > for the file I was complaining about, the number returned is 3080 (doesn't > exceed the number of chars though, (point-max) = 67641). Will try to obtain > usable timing data later today when I get home from work. Thanks! Thanks. It's large enough that noverlay might indeed make a difference for some operations, but not large enough to explain why line-number-at-pos would be so slow, I think. Stefan