From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Stephen.Berman@gmx.net: Re: redisplay] Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:08:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87mz0z5dux.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <462D059B.7020001@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177423759 31623 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2007 14:09:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 24 16:09:17 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgLhg-00075v-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:09:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgLnC-0003Wl-L5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:14:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgLn7-0003WU-W0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:14:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgLn5-0003WI-WB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:14:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgLn5-0003WF-QB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:14:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgLhX-0003FS-G2; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711F62CF273; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:09:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C59D3FE0; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:08:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 230E46C8CB; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:08:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <462D059B.7020001@swipnet.se> (Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv's?= message of "Mon\, 23 Apr 2007 21\:14\:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69938 Archived-At: > I can't reproduce it with or without Gtk+, *scratch* or not. I suspect it > is a timing issue in X. I don't think redisplay guarantees that all > redisplay related events has been received and handeled by Emacs before it > returns. Even if it does an XSync? In any case, I have regularly seen similar problems when leaving Emacs: if I have processes running, Emacs displays a *processes* list, and because of my pop-up-frames (and/or special-display-regexps) settings, it does it by first popping up a new frame displaying this *processes* buffer, and then pops up a dialog asking me whether I really want to quit. The problem is that the *processes* frame is generally blank at that point. Stefan