From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#222: isearch-repeat-forward: wrong overlay after failure Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:41:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tzh4rd41.fsf@jurta.org> <1D559CDD-D9EE-42D5-94F3-D7D33B9A1326@gmail.com> <85iqxke9ju.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1210603931 13181 80.91.229.12 (12 May 2008 14:52:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 14:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 12 16:52:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JvZOE-0008Fl-Hb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 16:52:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59904 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JvZNW-0007tK-Di for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JvZNR-0007sh-Hu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JvZNO-0007rx-TA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:51:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34895 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JvZNO-0007ru-Nz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:51:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:39062) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JvZNN-00062D-I7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:51:41 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m4CEpdrZ003414; Mon, 12 May 2008 07:51:39 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m4CEo3uL002768; Mon, 12 May 2008 07:50:03 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 14:50:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 222 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 222-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B222.12106032741896 (code B ref 222); Mon, 12 May 2008 14:50:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 222) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 May 2008 14:41:14 +0000 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m4CEfAfO001890 for <222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 12 May 2008 07:41:12 -0700 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AocDAGLzJ0jO+JgrdGdsb2JhbACBU5A7ASeYKw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,473,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="20411585" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca (HELO smtp.teksavvy.com) ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2008 10:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([206.248.152.43]) by smtp.teksavvy.com (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id STB65605; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:41:05 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 418657F83; Mon, 12 May 2008 10:41:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <85iqxke9ju.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 12 May 2008 00:54:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:51:44 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:17977 Archived-At: >>> `isearch-repeat-forward' is not an entry point to the incremental >>> search: >>> it doesn't activate isearch mode neither deactivates it. IIUC, it was >>> never intended for non-incremental search, so it doesn't guarantee to >>> work when isearch mode is not active. >>> >>> If you want to find the next occurrence without highlighting it >>> and without activating isearch mode, you can use the command >>> `search-forward'. >> >> isearch-repeat-forward is interactive, which is why I thought it would >> be a decent entry point. > Which I would call a reasonable expectation. However, keybindings even > in specialized keymaps need to be bound to interactive functions. So if > we have functions that are only intended for use in specialized keymaps, > there is no way to keep people from binding them to normal keymaps. > So it is sort of a combined documentation/expectation problem. I have > no good idea how to approach this. It's a very general problem: many keybindings used in major-mode or minor modes only work properly if the corresponding mode is currently active. Of course, many work perfectly in other contexts too, and yet many more work 98% OK as well. I don't think it makes sense to document each and every function describing whether it's expected to work in other modes or not. Stefan