From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#390: 23.0.60; killed buffer in list from function buffer-list? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:04:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <48504304.5030502@gmail.com> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 390@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213234046 794 80.91.229.12 (12 Jun 2008 01:27:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 390@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 12 03:28:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K6bbj-0000uv-B1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:28:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43508 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6bav-0000fy-Jf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6baq-0000fK-Ai for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6bao-0000eQ-RZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38713 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6bao-0000eK-KN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:49635) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6ban-00046p-Tn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m5C1R74G025080; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:27:07 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m5C1A6Kn020571; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:10:06 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:10:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 390 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 390-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B390.121323269818438 (code B ref 390); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:10:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 390) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 12 Jun 2008 01:04:58 +0000 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (69-196-141-115.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.141.115]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m5C14opp018432 for <390@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:04:51 -0700 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A594AB4102; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:04:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <48504304.5030502@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:26:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:11 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:18343 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:22611 Archived-At: > I sometimes get a killed buffer in the list returned from (buffer-list ...): That'd be a bug. [ Of course, it may also happen that the buffer dies between the call to buffer-list and the printing of the result, if you do something like a sit-for or read between the two. ] But without some kind of recipe to reproduce it, it's going to be difficult to track it down. Stefan