From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7567: Please add a history variable to read-regexp Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:48:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291695356 15399 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2010 04:15:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 04:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7567@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 07 05:15:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPoxu-0000n7-Pl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 05:15:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48747 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPoxu-00064D-3c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:15:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36997 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PPoxa-0005wG-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:15:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPoxZ-0001FG-Oo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:15:26 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PPoxZ-0001FA-KI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 23:15:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPoSD-0007fS-Rm; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:43:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7567 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7567-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7567.129169335629441 (code B ref 7567); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7567) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2010 03:42:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPoRo-0007eo-AJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:42:36 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PPoRn-0007eZ-5M for 7567@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:42:35 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqQHAAM9/UxFxLmf/2dsb2JhbACiMoEGcr9yhUkEhF+NfQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,308,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="84721866" Original-Received: from 69-196-185-159.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.185.159]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Dec 2010 22:48:28 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 6A7CD661BF; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:48:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 6 Dec 2010 03:24:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:43:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42255 Archived-At: So after reading the rest of the thread, I think I finally understand that you want to "add a history *argument* to read-regexp", right? Then it sounds perfectly acceptable. Using correct words always helps. Of course, explaining the problem in more details is also another way to avoid falling into such misunderstaning, via redundancy. Stefan