From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8364: 24.0.9999; PATCH: Fit to width/height/page for doc-view.el Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878vvz8sml.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87k4fj6z8e.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87hbanw3ll.fsf@member.fsf.org> <8762r0wsqj.fsf@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301521170 7208 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2011 21:39:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sho nakatani , 8364@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 23:39:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q536r-0005QU-Hk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 23:39:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52645 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q536r-0006Yz-1N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:39:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41615 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q534i-00051a-UI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q534h-0000sF-Gi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q534h-0000sB-BH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q52cT-0002JW-QI; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8364 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 8364-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8364.13015192658869 (code B ref 8364); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2011 21:07:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q52cC-0002J0-Ab for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q52cA-0002Im-9N for 8364@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:42 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABGbk01MCo6K/2dsb2JhbAClVXiIebYJhWoElhY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,270,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="98718271" Original-Received: from 76-10-142-138.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.142.138]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Mar 2011 17:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 89D0F5905D; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:07:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8762r0wsqj.fsf@member.fsf.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:08:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:08:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45508 Archived-At: > Where's the difference, except that you could scroll the margins if you > wanted to do so? I find it handy, yes. > Implementation-wise, the difference is that Nakatani's > current approach simply uses the image slice for the geometry, your > rectangle approach requires another buffer-local variable. I don't see why you'd need another buffer-local var. It'd just set the zoom level and the scrolling. Unless you mean a new buffer-local var to remember "keep it fitted", but I don't need that. Stefan