From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9571: 24.0.50; user option to turn off bidi, please Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:11:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316751109 1321 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2011 04:11:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 04:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9571@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 23 06:11:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6x70-0002p1-K5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 06:11:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53689 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6x6z-0007RY-Of for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51838) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6x6w-0007RR-Qe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6x6v-0000Uz-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:11:38 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43270) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R6x6v-0000Us-Sp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:11:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6x7J-0006JG-Oo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 04:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9571 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 9571-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9571.131675110624233 (code B ref 9571); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 04:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9571) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2011 04:11:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6x72-0006In-Tu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:11:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6x70-0006If-Bk for 9571@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:11:43 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak0JAJAGfE5MCqQE/2dsb2JhbABDmQaPAnmBUwEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgLtQqGfQSgWIRD X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,427,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="137994223" Original-Received: from 76-10-164-4.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.164.4]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 23 Sep 2011 00:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EBFB3660B6; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:11:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2011 06:13:03 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:12:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51686 Archived-At: > Can you imagine that there are some Emacs users who do not _ever_ need > or want to edit bidirectional text? If those users get a different behavior depending on bidi-display-reordering, then we have a bug. Stefan