From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Ubuntu 10.0: TERM=Linux: facemenu steals arrow keys Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:09:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20232.39090.943202.772602@gargle.gargle.HOWL> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326031789 10658 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2012 14:09:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 14:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 08 15:09:45 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjtRR-0006X2-2J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:09:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48575 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjtRQ-0006tl-75 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:09:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjtRN-0006tV-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:09:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjtRM-0007Ew-DJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:09:41 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:39681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RjtRM-0007Es-82 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 09:09:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q08E9b9i010286; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 09:09:38 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B208B58F7E; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 09:09:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20232.39090.943202.772602@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (T. V. Raman's message of "Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:10:42 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4095=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4095> : streams <717878> : uri <1042990> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147485 Archived-At: > I verified that this is still true with emacs -q -- but with a > minimal emacspeak environment loaded; I dont believe the binding > is coming from Emacspeak as far as I can tell. Can you check that -Q also shows this behavior? I can't think of how/where we'd setup such a binding. > It is bound to meta o d , META cap G d , > d , d . This text looks odd: what are those "meta" and "META" and "cap" keys? Stefan