From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexical-binding questions Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 00:55:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871umzrvfw.fsf@gmail.com> <33827449.post@talk.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336971334 7846 80.91.229.3 (14 May 2012 04:55:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 04:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: egnarts-ms Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 14 06:55:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1STnJi-00072L-Jo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 06:55:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39701 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STnJi-0002l3-3Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 00:55:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STnJf-0002kt-92 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 00:55:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STnJc-00006H-Nb for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 00:55:26 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:44392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STnJc-00005r-Ja for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 00:55:24 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApYIACxOgk/O+IOn/2dsb2JhbABDuCMDgQyBCIIJAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFtjKLYYR5BKRFgV2DAw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,391,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="180045746" Original-Received: from 206-248-131-167.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.131.167]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 14 May 2012 00:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 121995963F; Mon, 14 May 2012 00:55:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <33827449.post@talk.nabble.com> (egnarts-ms's message of "Sun, 13 May 2012 20:57:19 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.143.162 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150478 Archived-At: > I hope the article named "Lexical scope" in my > http://prog-elisp.blogspot.com/ blog might be useful for you. Indeed, this points to some further bugs in the byte-compiler's handling of (defvar ). Stefan