From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14750: [PATCH] Cleanup for "commit message" Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:29:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372707027 8375 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2013 19:30:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 19:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Xue Fuqiao , 14750@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 01 21:30:27 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Utjns-00079u-VZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 21:30:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42588 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Utjns-0001LT-Ga for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45499) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Utjnc-0000yA-32 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Utjna-0005JT-3q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Utjna-0005JJ-0U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UtjnX-0000o7-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:30:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 19:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14750 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 14750-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14750.13727069623009 (code B ref 14750); Mon, 01 Jul 2013 19:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14750) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jul 2013 19:29:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50912 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Utjmr-0000mR-Ix for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:29:21 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:52903) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Utjmp-0000mG-Ds for 14750@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r61JTFpt016646; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 15:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 00B8DAE169; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 15:29:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 30 Jun 2013 20:19:41 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4626=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4626> : streams <992394> : uri <1464032> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75775 Archived-At: >> I found that "commit message" is not used consistently. Maybe we should >> clean this up. > I don't think changing "log entry" for "commit message" everywhere is > desirable. It might be a good idea to use the two terms at one place (e.g. somewhere in the manual). But after that I think it makes sense to pick one term and stick to it. Stefan