From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new name for the state of a set of frames? Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:51:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <51F8CBD0.7020708@gmx.at> <87txjbt175.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87ehaevqly.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87li4l79ra.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvutgvtg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375386702 7997 80.91.229.3 (1 Aug 2013 19:51:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Emacs developers , martin rudalics , Thien-Thi Nguyen To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 01 21:51:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V4yuU-0006QE-L5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:51:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42166 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4yuU-0002io-7V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:51:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57250) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4yuK-0002cC-1u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4yuC-0003cT-K9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:51:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:26540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V4yu3-0003Zh-Li; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:51:15 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rw3m/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA6R6gV6DEw X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rw3m/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA6R6gV6DEw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="20370595" Original-Received: from 184-175-13-230.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.13.230]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Aug 2013 15:51:08 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3C2A362F7F; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:51:14 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87fvutgvtg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:33:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162333 Archived-At: >> Layout sounds good for frames-state. > Yep. And I also agree "view" is ambiguous. > What about "panel" for windows-state? Hmm... I see where you're coming from, but I don't like it very much (outside of its use in the context of GUIs, the word "panel" doesn't seem to evoke anything close to a windows-state for me). There's worse and I could live with it, but I'm not sold on the idea. Stefan