From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17215: Acknowledgement (Build failure) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:21:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871tx9k1dy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ioqfdfuw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <53483E5E.8020705@dancol.org> <837g6vt079.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1397308948 10932 80.91.229.3 (12 Apr 2014 13:22:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17215@debbugs.gnu.org, dak@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 12 15:22:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WYxsy-0007tZ-LB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 15:22:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34437 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYxsx-0008SA-Up for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:22:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYxso-0008S3-4D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYxsg-0006k3-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYxsg-0006jy-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:22:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WYxsg-0005Gt-5D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17215 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 17215-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17215.139730888320203 (code B ref 17215); Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17215) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2014 13:21:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WYxs2-0005Fm-BK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:21:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:55071) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WYxrz-0005Fc-QY for 17215@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:21:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s3CDLFLn028867; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:21:15 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3A12360228; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 09:21:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <837g6vt079.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2014 11:35:06 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4910=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4910> : inlines <726> : streams <1157500> : uri <1727339> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:87973 Archived-At: > More people building development code doesn't mean more people who > know what to do about pure storage. So just aborting without any > helpful information (e.g., how much to enlarge the pure space, and > what macro to change) doesn't seem like progress to me. At least they'll come and look for a solution to "not enough pure space", rather than report bugs about slowdowns and whatnots which make us waste time trying to figure out what's going on. Stefan