From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: disabling undo boundaries Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:23:27 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87fv746rd5.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87mw0zk7yp.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87617mgp1b.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <871ti9ammc.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <878ucaqm3g.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87y4hrm911.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87wpx79pz6.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87pp2wmpxy.fsf@russet.org.uk> <878u9kcsot.fsf@newcastle.ac.uk> <87vbcnh4sp.fsf@russet.org.uk> <871tf8cf0t.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439432626 13379 80.91.229.3 (13 Aug 2015 02:23:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 02:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 13 04:23:37 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPiB6-0007Om-Fj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Aug 2015 04:23:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40759 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPiB5-00087u-Ho for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46598) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPiB1-00087j-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:23:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPiAy-0002mx-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:23:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:56645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZPiAy-0002mM-BB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:23:28 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ArEwA731xV//gFNJ1cgxCEAoVVuzcJh0sEAgKBPDkUAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNiFsIzyMBAQEBBgIBH4s6hQUHhC0FtQQjhBQigngBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0ArEwA731xV//gFNJ1cgxCEAoVVuzcJh0sEAgKBPDkUAQEBAQEBAYEKQQWDXQEBAwFWIwULCzQSFBgNiFsIzyMBAQEBBgIBH4s6hQUHhC0FtQQjhBQigngBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="159728199" Original-Received: from 157-52-5-248.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([157.52.5.248]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 12 Aug 2015 22:23:28 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 67A78607D9; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:23:27 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871tf8cf0t.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Wed, 12 Aug 2015 23:34:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188769 Archived-At: > a big buffer-undo-list" I can certainly do. Any reason to not do this on > a timer (i.e. why tie it to the command cycle)? As mentioned, for buffers modified by timers/processes I like the idea of adding undo-boundaries every N seconds or every N modifications. Stefan