From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we restore manually maintained ChangeLogs Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:09:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <56DE0F6A.6010207@cs.ucla.edu> <83pov5rmt6.fsf@gnu.org> <56DFD78F.40205@cs.ucla.edu> <56E06093.7050509@cs.ucla.edu> <83twkfo7ij.fsf@gnu.org> <20160309181005.GF3948@acm.fritz.box> <87vb4vuu59.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> <87pov3nrnm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83mvq6n7xs.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1r2mzuy.fsf@gnu.org> <8360wumxj4.fsf@gnu.org> <56E1A228.6040602@cs.ucla.edu> <83fuvykw02.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457637058 23709 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2016 19:10:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 19:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 10 20:10:49 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ae5yz-0008Mg-4R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:10:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50773 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae5yu-0007z2-TH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48437) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae5yZ-0007yj-Jp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:10:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae5yY-00068L-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:10:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:18344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae5yV-00066F-5X; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:10:19 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BCFgA731xV/0a6+M5cgxCEAoVVwwgDBAICgTw9EAEBAQEBAQGBCkEFg10BAQMBViMFCws0EhQYDSSINwjPIwEBAQEGAQEBAR6LOoUFB4QtBYwwpw+BRSOEFiCCeAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0BCFgA731xV/0a6+M5cgxCEAoVVwwgDBAICgTw9EAEBAQEBAQGBCkEFg10BAQMBViMFCws0EhQYDSSINwjPIwEBAQEGAQEBAR6LOoUFB4QtBYwwpw+BRSOEFiCCeAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="195888447" Original-Received: from 206-248-186-70.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.186.70]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2016 14:10:00 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3975660420; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 14:09:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83fuvykw02.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:50:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201422 Archived-At: > I think we also need to test-drive it before we decide to use it. > I hope someone will try that and report back. Indeed. E.g. if there are ten thousand replacements, does it affect performance noticeably? Stefan