From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, raeburn@raeburn.org,
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Subject: Re: Can we go GTK-only?
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 20:27:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvh97qu3t4.fsf-monnier+Inbox@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83ziljm0ei.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 01 Nov 2016 22:05:09 +0200")
> I was not talking about multithreading in general. I was talking
> specifically about Emacs, its coding practices, and its particular
> design and needs wrt memory allocation. I named several factors that
OK, so we agree that Emacs can assume that on any system where we can
use multithreading we can assume that the system's malloc will work just
right. So the only potential difficulties come from Emacs itself,
i.e. things over which *we* have control.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-02 0:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 19:54 Can we go GTK-only? Daniel Colascione
2016-10-27 20:05 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-27 20:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-27 21:08 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-27 20:32 ` Paul Eggert
2016-10-27 23:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-10-28 7:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 2:35 ` Richard Stallman
2016-10-28 6:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 7:27 ` Ulrich Mueller
2016-10-28 8:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 10:48 ` Frank Haun
2016-10-28 12:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-28 13:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-30 14:43 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-30 21:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-30 22:49 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-30 23:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-10-31 3:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 0:00 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-10-31 8:24 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-31 16:34 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 8:22 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-10-31 3:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:57 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-10-31 15:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:59 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-10-31 16:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 17:54 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-10-31 20:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 15:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 18:22 ` Ken Raeburn
2016-10-31 20:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-10-31 21:04 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 15:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:28 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-01 16:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:54 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:16 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 19:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:28 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-11-01 19:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 16:55 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-01 17:15 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:41 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:22 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 17:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:56 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:35 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 16:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:06 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:18 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 17:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 17:45 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 19:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-01 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 19:42 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 19:20 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-01 20:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-01 20:17 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-01 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 2:26 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-02 15:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 15:55 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-02 5:00 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-11-02 15:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-03 3:43 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2016-11-03 17:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 0:27 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2016-11-02 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-02 16:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-02 19:25 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-02 19:25 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-02 20:33 ` Paul Eggert
2016-11-03 1:25 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-02 20:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-03 3:29 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-03 18:07 ` John Wiegley
2016-11-03 22:07 ` John Wiegley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwvh97qu3t4.fsf-monnier+Inbox@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=perry@piermont.com \
--cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.