From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: netsec 682578f 4/6: Add option to bypass NSM TLS checks on local networks Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:14:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20180714170806.8972.58581@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180714170809.C3A3920456@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87o9f84t89.fsf@gmail.com> <4C758D1D-7C3A-425A-852F-75E03C779E01@gmail.com> <87va9fs3ro.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1531757574 29936 195.159.176.226 (16 Jul 2018 16:12:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:12:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 16 18:12:50 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ff67F-0007et-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:12:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52734 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff69L-0000gA-2b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:14:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff69E-0000g4-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:14:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff69A-0002kd-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:14:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39928 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ff69A-0002kG-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 12:14:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ff670-0007QT-LF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2018 18:12:34 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:oqPnFy2t+Dk0Sk0Lq++pfleWWZ0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227463 Archived-At: >> Iʼm terrible at choosing names, please suggest better ones >> (hostname-lookup, gethostbyname,....?). Output currently looks like >> this, including a port number, but thatʼs easily changed: > I wish I could think of a better name. All the good names are taken by > terrible implementations LOL All the C functions dealing with the network should use a common namespace prefix, I think. That could be "network-" or "inet-" or various others. Stefan "just helping paint the shed"