From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 83587bb 1/2: Correctly cache sorted completions in icomplete--sorted-completions Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:24:44 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20191225175851.21930.86980@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20191225175852.DE63E20997@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83eewrq9zp.fsf@gnu.org> <834kxmrfn9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="55809"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 27 03:25:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ikfJN-000ENl-NV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 03:25:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59170 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ikfJM-0006Qi-0C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:25:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ikfJG-0006QL-AO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:25:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ikfJE-0007mZ-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:25:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ikfJD-0007lw-0D; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:24:59 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A52BA44D5F2; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:24:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1A32D44D5EA; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:24:52 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1577413492; bh=XreWsreODAdCKCy/ehZ49khtPdw0BdpkAZIoTogzEqg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=BqsOqWFcPbR7ZO5jPSanHNbyxq1H+OlzjIBOBhFr3bPnAnySgLSTH04eOfv2N8fig DTp5iwRmqUgAFQIB/Z8MmlbpkPYrnNYDkPGQIsb/hrT5AC0hZFbs3p6V+G5HRuL0yp K2oElPr2DP5+IYQSY48AH0Y3lc6zF0ah57msDxOYq7nZqhgJL3hfROG6/kSKaZEYua n/5ulU1wLmXjBNzZVgg/G3qh01Wp3+vZuP8x4h3Qva0di6/ZUhxpQtuZ83ueg+S/Pq KvWsNfIh0d4gHE+pIxKUf05AsXOubesn6zHA2f3o0pEfK9vaXUSBo98zYeJVQtnz2b n5bSPEG3wMj1w== Original-Received: from alfajor (104-222-126-118.cpe.teksavvy.com [104.222.126.118]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72D311212FB; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:24:51 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <834kxmrfn9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 26 Dec 2019 22:33:14 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243686 Archived-At: > So you may wish to submit a bug report against Gmail for too na=EFve > threading. FWIW, I believe it's considered to take extra work to perform this treading (at least in Gnus, IIRC). I think "naive" would be to only do "threading" based on the subject. It's not uncommon for replies to lack proper In-Reply-To or References headers, sadly. Stefan