From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:43:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <20200404104553.GA5329@ACM> <07fe3b69-3ab2-3173-0696-cb17809e2b91@gmx.at> <83blo7v68b.fsf@gnu.org> <1845d7aa-9ae4-3d95-6a30-c7b1d8d8adec@gmx.at> <83a73qt6zs.fsf@gnu.org> <97c4254e-ff43-8402-3645-f713c408c245@gmx.at> <83y2r9syby.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv1xsset.fsf@gnu.org> <5ba98104-7154-972a-743a-9865e10ae3dd@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="90279"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 07 01:43:42 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jLbP4-000NP8-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 01:43:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39118 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLbP3-0005m3-D6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:43:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jLbOZ-0005Ml-8K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLbOY-0005Ro-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:62026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jLbOX-0005PS-6G; Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 651EC81189; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 19:43:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C74A980D6C; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 19:43:06 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1586216586; bh=zXl85ilHwzj0lsnu/lNTlnLPcANgHAW+U1IlIy1yhyg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=AFJvTBuwfcTeGTro07EM1GCE0Jv10iswQ0b8xMjuzQjsQ3myTHJmryuT3yHmVCc6v TLAThLVY9y2VQwOeVIRh40H2po4jFNUpt+8ZJZ4btDsdJ+pl82WYdGEpYddKHnghO0 rV+Wu96I9LVJHvdlAGAEInvgMzY1I+RmZtVwY1b+6pGzrus2h2OxfVbGW5SXFKZPQZ UJzIrVMiA1wwg2GM/z7BRqUADlQwCT+qefNlkL3R0WQilKB1Okfg1DKNi0R8c6ZrsB Fh6Vha35STc5R9Lnauyg4l53fWOgSfAnAG4bx0/QCxfxXD9vp93JwOmyU8BgDGy7WR V5RLo5DG3ZsSg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 435DB120172; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 19:43:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 7 Apr 2020 00:40:56 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246574 Archived-At: > that = skip jit-lock when input is pending. AFAIK jit-lock is never skipped: it's (part of) the redisplay which is skipped (and that in turn may include calls to jit-lock). Stefan