From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Fix" sag scaling for hidpi Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:59:27 -0500 Message-ID: References: <07D5E64D-DAD0-45B3-B272-627A73D7CBAE@gmail.com> <7308DB2C-27A5-4227-A1F9-9949EE558052@gmail.com> <87sg6alweo.fsf@gnus.org> <87pn1erewq.fsf@gmail.com> <87wnvlecrw.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg69o3av.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtwhctte.fsf@gnus.org> <459A0475-E3E7-4159-82DF-93809CCF1E24@gmail.com> <87eehng52n.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtwbye5b.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6saya8u.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6273"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Yuan Fu , Eli Zaretskii , Alan Third , emacs-devel To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 16:01:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lADTI-0001T1-4m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:01:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lADTH-0002DD-4n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lADRX-0001VP-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:59:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:33374) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lADRM-0001lg-9V; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:59:37 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C90D410025D; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:59:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8BE95100229; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:59:28 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1613055568; bh=ExXLFO+mM4inCDUBVgN59TiC+BeIosfv6xPBwXyVrB0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=kE/W0brEl39fXl88od1TaQeJvp2DYycfn7Yy13y1CH15Z7D4UF72R73KD/hUOtYRd f5B8KbvB7zJuQ2TuvbAOKpkmR49l9UXvs7fN+nGvSAWeRl3iGB6SRymT9MsrpGmPoU koaeNTUkfL3RWVBzbNGXTNGq4i1CjoJxOR1YkcvGMpzbLyGT60ScfJUcbiqPSt4RZu aGRHb1TgiQKH4EjEqon3lPmxTqJ7aLueote2MOe/hqGpIFx7ZfeEtXKMQJjiw0Vn0J Fm2T7J8H5JRJRLb77qBtNlwKWN4Bll9ZElx5mIvtUqnarWH9xKLVMOIaerkYC71TM4 5uxnQNd2+4CYA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 444D71202F2; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:59:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87a6saya8u.fsf@gmail.com> (Robert Pluim's message of "Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:01:05 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264389 Archived-At: > >> Eli, Lars, when can we realistically envisage deprecating lucid > >> support? Followed a release later by the current gtk support. > Stefan> I suspect that the "current gtk" support will disappear befor= e the Lucid > Stefan> support, since the Lucid support is still AFAIK the only one = that > Stefan> supports having frames on multiple X servers. > ? both pure and impure gtk let you do that. I don't know the status of the pgtk port with respect to multiple-displays, but for the "impure gtk" port, it's at best flaky. > Are you talking about the 'crash when the display goes away' problem? Yes. > That=CA=BCs an annoyance, but it doesn=CA=BCt stop you using multiple fra= mes. I'm not talking about multiple frames, but about multiple displays. Stefan