From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Core package offering - engrave-faces.el Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:33:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y2afv122.fsf@gmail.com> <871r7yztf3.fsf@gmail.com> <7319ffa7-d566-41b8-b778-69db2f6becc9@gmail.com> <87h7guxv7k.fsf@gmail.com> <87eebpjahs.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtp0nj7l.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10300"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Timothy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 30 01:34:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUJb-0002RP-Cp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 01:34:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38720 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUJZ-0004P9-NO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56042) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUIe-0003iB-Jr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:33:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:14810) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mKUIb-00035C-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:33:14 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id ED10C80A79; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:33:10 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 63BC28084B; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:33:09 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1630279989; bh=jTc3jb9MDkDrOrC/uN66Tn7IWYIwFzS1sPLPqvuIjSQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=W1quv5+CGvlhegbdGAeT8o6lYD8QqzHqiifRaS9ZJiRA8iu9bjPQNo2Nm/YkvG5rl NP3WanHekMJWKmMS7M0YSIXOhRa/xpvcs0xayC0rCWFRZRW1OQj1ql3x4ev5p+BwQO SMpB++gtTlt4DKBX58aOFAKORyqC1tdpgPd/HM0KSfZkSCJlSsiyES1wzNZmHJvTMy 0nztT0Ndl/aRjLKVVbQjvbV3L1lz1k2OdcBLRNcAmDcYyB6gpI4TMRKKGBbijDeeYb hZxUI3WFW4Oe2EquG1j6cmpFLGF82n0PLZZj1bQOkb/vVhPW+e7agVCIJpi5fiGCc6 a/6qxP8+mR1YQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.244.135]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E2791201F4; Sun, 29 Aug 2021 19:33:09 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87mtp0nj7l.fsf@gmail.com> (Timothy's message of "Mon, 30 Aug 2021 03:11:50 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273441 Archived-At: >> From the side-lines: I=E2=80=99d be happy to add it to GNU ELPA if you= =E2=80=99re >> interested, and I=E2=80=99ll let others decide whether to add it to >> Emacs itself. > Thanks for the offer. While I=E2=80=99ve left this linger I=E2=80=99ve be= en mulling over what I > think would be best in the near future. While I still consider this to be > something likely worth replacing/supplimenting htmlfontify with in due co= urse, > given how young this is I suspect that this package could benefit from li= ving > somewhere which lets it mature a bit and possibly make the odd breaking c= hange > as it settles down =E2=80=94 like ELPA! If you give the URL of a Git repository from which we can fetch that package, I'll see about adding it to GNU ELPA. Stefan