From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [nongnu] elpa/rainbow-delimiters a32b39bdfe: Add license file with GPLv3 Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 15:12:20 -0500 Message-ID: References: <164107430330.17202.17260845381664886032@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220101215824.BB13CC0DEC3@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87ilv2s6bc.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="963"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 02 21:13:54 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n47Eo-000Adu-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 21:13:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45436 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n47Em-00018a-50 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 15:13:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n47DT-0000QD-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 15:12:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:4643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n47DR-00023R-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Jan 2022 15:12:30 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6D17910018E; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 15:12:27 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0C77B100054; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 15:12:22 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1641154342; bh=kZv/5IW7RcTTGf3laz6K8fczTbQffNhcEFq1x+evR3Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=UNCx1VOgypPL0wwDpWtRCnMXF8GszN8QioDeU1FBaQQDkl26QGLWj7SXAnc21SNVm 930uhRkQKVYVCylK8qvbXLH+IAVJFZnVENlSnxVmJhSl/AWLuQ2KAMkAb9y+5ATimU plVNWAyGsEMgDanc7LWshHD3BZho1Do6V5LmHdJbP1zuAN/CIyZ6UU8yeG48OoINAa 3CfPdfF2BPOjhZqDVq154Om5VwR9fsZHL6gDI4FwRuRedPD6Eu0htPzys6hcI7SPSH z6dkIe4Cp6saTHOFzmYl9Ci1K4fJqkIfm1aMs3hlI1afHoKodjVkZZvVSzL2WS1hqz InMj7HhzYZRjw== Original-Received: from ceviche (unknown [216.154.30.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D439212022E; Sun, 2 Jan 2022 15:12:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ilv2s6bc.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Sun, 02 Jan 2022 11:52:39 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283967 Archived-At: > And while we are at it, is there a reason not to add a MELPA-like > keyword to manually specify what files are part of a package? Whenever > a single repository is used to maintain multiple packages (like Magit or > Embark) there is always a long list of :ignored-files that have to be > duplicated for every package. Perhaps a more general version of > .elpaignore could be used to declare packages externally. I'm not very much in favor: - We currently don't support such packages well anyway. There are various more-or-less minor annoyances that could be fixed without too much effort, e.g. the various Magit-derived packages get redundantly auto-sync'd, and they result in duplicate worktrees (unless you manually replace them with symlinks, admittedly). - It gets worse when you consider installation via Git (rather than via ELPA), in which case you get all the sub-packages in your `load-path` even if you only activate one of them; and it's not clear how to fix that. This second point (to me) means that we want to discourage these kinds of multi-packages that are bundled in a single branch. Stefan