From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68244: hash-table improvements Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <170438379722.3921.9312235725296561206@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <19265EA5-E6F3-446C-AD9B-763693CF0A48@gmail.com> <6F3E332D-54ED-4E70-BBAA-A207750B52F8@gmail.com> <13877748-AFAB-4310-A0CA-104752C8BF2D@gmail.com> <5C9DFD74-B166-444E-BFDC-D022826098C8@gmail.com> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32003"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= , Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , 68244@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 14 14:06:12 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1raExo-000872-0T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:06:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1raExV-0008Gn-6u; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1raExP-0008Ep-Bk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1raExM-0000Tk-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1raExe-0007Oj-6g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68244.170791594528413 (code B ref 68244); Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2024 13:05:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1raExN-0007OD-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:41780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1raExL-0007Ny-0G for 68244@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:44 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 9DF8110005D; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:18 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1707915913; bh=36/mwGzEB1qjOHb6879TbPpFGI7sdoBue3Mj9WFv3/A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=VBlK/47UdemMHNu57kYz9G4hWgtdnSeaK7wZqlOYaVOJ7dZNiEXrGKDpXofcdsnTc XtRVFbbNfj3DgHOxNAKcS0kYAsjHtPGXqUQ85SatZVUUBe/x3LlqZgS2F0u72Jjvvh F3yswbZyldGbKGSuk9Ap6NbkxKFpwz1oQ4SY+if4lyDY2lpWWZjJM0ktHwee2E0rjY GzJO2g+tXnjcAG/h/59KblvLiPYc0QZStN68bGY9D3bEz+UEzIB//NkQPhhYhBpSQ3 dZEZUgdpimjzbZMdYwqBA67RwPaI668OUSzG2esht6kJC3Bi+4OLGRWp0bjSkgPxzZ zTeyLJH0f40Vg== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5AB0B10004B; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.197.152]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23E11120213; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:05:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <5C9DFD74-B166-444E-BFDC-D022826098C8@gmail.com> ("Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?="'s message of "Wed, 14 Feb 2024 13:37:49 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280003 Archived-At: >>> With Stefan's suggestion, if I understood it right, >>> we'd have `obarray-make` return (vector 0). >> I did not suggest such a thing. > Sorry, didn't mean to misrepresent. I should have said that it is one way of > implementing `obarray-make` if compatibility with vector-assuming code > really is a serious concern. BTW, my idea adjusted for the kind of compatibility you're after would have been to define `obarray-make` as (vector (internal-make-real-obarray)) >> I think it's worth introducing a bit of incompatibility, for the benefit >> of a cleaner API. Such incompatibility should be very easy to fix while >> still maintaining compatibility with old Emacsen (at least back to >> Emacs-25, where the `obarray-make` and `obarrayp` were introduced). > I'm all for it but those obarray functions weren't mentioned in NEWS at the > time nor in the manual (which even today recommends, even mandates, use of > make-vector) so perhaps we need a bridge? You might be right. I guess time will tell :-) Stefan