From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Port of Emacs client / server programs to Windows NT Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:16:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20061028090605.GA16477@janet> <85r6wqk496.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162171043 22070 80.91.229.2 (30 Oct 2006 01:17:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 01:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Neil Roberts , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 30 02:17:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeLm4-0003Hp-I3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Oct 2006 02:17:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeLm3-0001NI-SB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:17:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GeLlq-0001MJ-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:16:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GeLlp-0001KS-4S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:16:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GeLlo-0001KA-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:16:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.74] (helo=tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GeLlo-0007Dc-6H; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:16:56 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([74.12.204.221]) by tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20061030011655.JJPB16051.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:16:55 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 308BD8273; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:16:55 -0500 (EST) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85r6wqk496.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon\, 30 Oct 2006 01\:59\:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61361 Archived-At: >>> The advantages of using named pipes instead of TCP are: >> It has some disadvantages as well: >> - They're specific to a non-free OS. > Uh what? Can you name a free general-purpose OS that does not have > named pipes? Uh, ahem, I guess I got confused, sorry, Stefan