From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New look for Emacs-23.0 Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:24:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215480300 9964 80.91.229.12 (8 Jul 2008 01:25:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 01:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Francesc Rocher" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 08 03:25:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KG1xi-0006SU-RY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 03:25:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45147 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KG1wq-0006wQ-UQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:24:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KG1wo-0006wK-J2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:24:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KG1wm-0006w4-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:24:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47848 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KG1wm-0006w1-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:55194 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KG1wm-0001va-8j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:24:48 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmwDAFNeckjO+IfCdGdsb2JhbACBXJEHASeeBoF4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,319,1212379200"; d="scan'208";a="24077436" Original-Received: from 206-248-135-194.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.135.194]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2008 21:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7376A8116; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 21:24:43 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Francesc Rocher's message of "Mon, 7 Jul 2008 23:28:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100441 Archived-At: > May be what's wrong is that 'x-display-planes' is used to test whether > 'splash8.xpm' or 'splash.xpm' must be displayed. I think it's wrong > because both images are not so different. Judging by the name of these > images, I did suppose they had different color depth. Surprisingly, > I've found this: Indeed, I also saw that the 2 images are low-color versions, so the test didn't make much sense, but the situation now is very different because the new files use up many colors, so the display-depth should be used to guard the use of those new high-color images. Stefan