From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#3889: 23.1.50; [PATCH] Increase blink-matching-paren-distance Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:22:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 3889@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248194296 4704 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2009 16:38:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:38:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, 3889@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Ian Eure Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 21 18:38:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MTILv-0007QS-Ju for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:38:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37372 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTILv-0004aT-4Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTILU-0004Cq-2S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MTILO-00048C-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:37:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37352 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MTILO-000483-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:34907) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTILM-00044Q-OG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n6LGbTX5028420; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:37:30 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n6LGU3b3026867; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:30:03 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3889 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.124819336325854 (code B ref -1); Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:30:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 21 Jul 2009 16:22:43 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n6LGMdwC025848 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:22:40 -0700 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:55987) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MTI6w-0001qP-I5 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTI6v-0008Fg-4n for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.110]:58022) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MTI6u-0008FQ-Jl for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:22:36 -0400 Original-Received: from toip4.srvr.bell.ca ([209.226.175.87]) by tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20090721162220.PIO14846.tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip4.srvr.bell.ca> for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:22:20 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsgEAKSCZUpBXrWz/2dsb2JhbACBUdFGhAwF Original-Received: from bas1-montreal02-1096725939.dsl.bell.ca (HELO ceviche.home) ([65.94.181.179]) by toip4.srvr.bell.ca with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2009 12:37:32 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 75E42B41BF; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:22:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Ian Eure's message of "Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:49:46 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:37:39 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:29538 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:24825 Archived-At: > Attached is a patch which doubles this to 50kb, as this should be fine for > modern machines. 100kB should be fine, indeed. > I think that we should seriously consider setting the default to nil, > but this seems like a more conservative approach to the matter. Maybe when you're browsing a 200MB log file, you'll find it painful, so a lower limit would still seem to make sense. 100kB is probably very conservative (even when running on my poor cell-phone, it should be fast enough). Stefan