From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: anything.el inclusion Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:19:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y6hib6vi.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <8739zp80up.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87vdck20mp.fsf@tux.homenetwork> <87ocic1z3x.fsf@tux.homenetwork> <871vf8o684.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <8739zoxujx.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org> <87r5n737xc.fsf@tux.homenetwork> <87mxxvlgbg.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87iq8j35te.fsf@tux.homenetwork> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269637410 4645 80.91.229.12 (26 Mar 2010 21:03:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Thierry Volpiatto Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 26 22:03:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvGgZ-0003cC-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:03:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43991 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvGgE-0000gX-Ks for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:02:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvG9P-00050D-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:29:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46910 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvG9E-0004o7-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:29:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvG0K-0008Ew-B5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:19:41 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:59392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvG0K-0008Eo-5O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:19:40 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o2QKJb9S000343; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:19:37 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4CEB63A0F4; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:19:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87iq8j35te.fsf@tux.homenetwork> (Thierry Volpiatto's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:22:53 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3500=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122724 Archived-At: >> I mean these completions would be useful for standard existing >> commands as well. > Yes, i agree, but they need anything system to be dynamic, standard > emacs commands use static completion (one shot completion, no timer). I don't really know what you guys are talking about. Can someone give an example of what behavior is under discussion here? Stefan PS: No objection to including anything.el from me.