From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:37:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87d3w2ncqs.fsf_-_@lola.goethe.zz> <87iq5py7xk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83hbl8li1o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276375054 7603 80.91.229.12 (12 Jun 2010 20:37:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 20:37:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , dak@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: James Cloos Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 12 22:37:32 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONXSN-00036r-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 22:37:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60960 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONXSM-0004aG-Kq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:37:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51679 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONXSG-0004YX-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONXSG-00043Q-4Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:37:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:28775 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONXSD-00042p-3s; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:37:21 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap0HAAaNE0xMCoQR/2dsb2JhbACBKp1Xcr1ohRoEjQI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,408,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="67921641" Original-Received: from 76-10-132-17.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO alfajor.home) ([76.10.132.17]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2010 16:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DBFA5BE9F3; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 16:37:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (James Cloos's message of "Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:17:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125855 Archived-At: > Again, I used the terms correctly. If I wrote logically then the RIGHT > key moved forward in reading direction and the LEFT backward. The difference between logical and visual movement only really makes sense when you have R2L text within an L2R paragraph (or vice-versa). Stefan