From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:18:33 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83fx0jgxk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83eig3gspa.fsf@gnu.org> <83bpb7gp2g.fsf@gnu.org> <837hlvglvh.fsf@gnu.org> <834ogzglaj.fsf@gnu.org> <8339wjgg8w.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6eagb7g.fsf@gnu.org> <4C1D24E3.5080402@harpegolden.net> <83sk4ig1t7.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxuqg0tz.fsf@gnu.org> <4C1D427D.9000503@harpegolden.net> <83bpb5fu7c.fsf@gnu.org> <837hltf5vr.fsf@gnu.org> <4C1FE262.3000407@harpegolden.net> <83lja5ef8g.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277331530 21932 80.91.229.12 (23 Jun 2010 22:18:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, David De La Harpe Golden To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 24 00:18:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORYHN-000461-4C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:18:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41167 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORYHM-0001Of-18 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:18:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60288 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORYHG-0001OP-PH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORYHF-0000Ej-RX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:18:38 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-01.vtx.ch ([194.38.175.90]:36848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORYHC-0000ED-PV; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:18:34 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (dyn.83-228-160-070.dsl.vtx.ch [83.228.160.70]) by smtp-01.vtx.ch (VTX Services SA) with ESMTP id D257827F45; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:18:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A115166130; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:18:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83lja5ef8g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:11:27 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126354 Archived-At: > After looking at the code and experimenting a bit, I think there's no > other way to prevent recentering on slow machines except set > redisplay-dont-pause non-nil. (You could also try playing with > redisplay-preemption-period, which basically gives you more fine > granularity than just the ON/OFF you get with redisplay-dont-pause.) Could explain the reason why you think it can't be done? Stefan