From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6781: emacs server with X11 build on OSX Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:27:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83F33443-0C3F-4F9B-B584-D9301250B8FC@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285368566 8059 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2010 22:49:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6781@debbugs.gnu.org, Ken Raeburn , Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 00:49:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzH51-0000kv-DT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:49:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzGx8-0007DR-8H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51648 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzGx2-0007DM-9a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzGx1-0001Fp-4P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzGx1-0001Fl-20 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzGiQ-0001iD-IV; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6781 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6781-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6781.12853671156572 (code B ref 6781); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 22:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6781) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2010 22:25:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzGhe-0001hx-MM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzGhc-0001hl-KQ for 6781@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:25:13 -0400 Original-Received: from dyn.83-228-173-129.dsl.vtx.ch ([83.228.173.129]:13984 helo=fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzGkD-0003Fe-EY; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:27:53 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 73E3F6611D; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:27:54 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:38:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:26:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40410 Archived-At: >>> But, all in all, I agree that if `localhost' can be interpreted as >>> variably as Ken has pointed out, we shouldn't use it. >> Could you make the corresponding change in `trunk'? > OK to this change, then? Looks OK, thanks, Stefan