From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: indentation of functions inside flet Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:13:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <33173596.post@talk.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327068850 1081 80.91.229.12 (20 Jan 2012 14:14:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:14:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: egnarts-ms Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 20 15:14:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RoFEE-0006Lq-8Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:14:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44555 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RoFED-0004kn-Ec for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RoFE6-0004jy-Ok for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RoFE0-0005Ds-Lh for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:13:58 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:38891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RoFE0-0005Do-I7 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:13:52 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAAJ2GU9MCos2/2dsb2JhbABDrgCBBoFyAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiA+4W4wmBIg8mnCEVg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,542,1320642000"; d="scan'208";a="157769590" Original-Received: from 76-10-139-54.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.139.54]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 20 Jan 2012 09:13:51 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 295835946E; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:13:51 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <33173596.post@talk.nabble.com> (egnarts-ms's message of "Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:50:46 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147772 Archived-At: > So it would be nice if Lisp mode indented such function definitions like > defuns. I wonder, has anyone cared about this before me (I'm sure someone > has) and are there any improvements to the Lisp mode available ? It would be nice if CL macros were indented better, I agree. Note that the way to do it is to put the bulk of the code in cl(-*).el and only change lisp-mode.el so as to provide hooks that CL needs. Stefan