From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unifying emacs "go to definition" functionality Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:51:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361368337 28468 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2013 13:52:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:52:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Helmut Eller , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 20 14:52:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8A6A-0003AH-Co for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:52:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38078 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8A5q-00057D-73 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:52:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8A5e-00054C-T6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:52:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8A5V-00086q-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:52:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:44516) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8A5V-00086g-4C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:51:57 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXXp/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IfAQVWIxALNBIUGA0kiCTBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXXp/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IfAQVWIxALNBIUGA0kiCTBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="1804742" Original-Received: from 108-161-117-233.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.117.233]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 20 Feb 2013 08:51:55 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8FEE86D7F4; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:51:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:36:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157203 Archived-At: >>>> I think M-, is the better choice and it should be the standard. >>> M-, is already taken. >> Keybindings aren't cast in stone. > There must be a very strong reason to throw out such a useful binding. Since tags-loop-continue can't always work, the M-, binding can partly be shared with another without too many conflicts. Whether sharing it with pop-tag-mark is a good idea, I don't know, tho. Stefan