From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Which keyboard hotkey syntax should we use? Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:47:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1369925468 12806 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2013 14:51:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 14:51:08 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 30 16:51:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4C3-0006Xr-L9 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 16:51:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4C3-0006NR-AV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4B7-0005OZ-UF for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:50:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4B3-0007Iw-ER for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:50:09 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4B2-0007Gl-UO for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 10:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ui4B1-0005hs-W5 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2013 16:50:03 +0200 Original-Received: from 69-165-139-76.dsl.teksavvy.com ([69.165.139.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 16:50:03 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 69-165-139-76.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 16:50:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69-165-139-76.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7aIPoyY8TfvxGLmUCVAC9BL+PYg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:91167 Archived-At: > There's (kbd "...") and [...]. Could we deprecate one of these in favor of > the other for simplicity? The [...] notation is the internal one, so it's probably not going away any time soon. We could try and deprecate the `kbd' syntax, but I think most people would rather deprecate the [...] syntax instead ;-) Stefan