From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16692: 24.2; nlinum version 1.2 does not work correctly with indirect buffers Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:14:40 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87ob2hxuzb.fsf@foil.strangled.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392743778 17027 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2014 17:16:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16692@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mark Lillibridge Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 18 18:16:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoHO-0004I7-B0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:16:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52000 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoHN-0002HW-QJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:16:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoHD-0002HO-SS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:16:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoH5-0007Bb-4I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoH5-0007BX-0y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:16:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoH4-0005ta-OA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16692 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16692-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16692.139274371022559 (code B ref 16692); Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16692) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2014 17:15:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58675 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoGD-0005rl-6S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:35981) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoG9-0005ra-Ab for 16692@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F24B84CED; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:15:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963991E5913; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:14:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7CCB1B40FE; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:14:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ob2hxuzb.fsf@foil.strangled.net> (Mark Lillibridge's message of "Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:30:48 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85832 Archived-At: > Hit enter multiple times; observe that line numbers for the new > lines appear in the original buffer but not the indirect buffer you > are currently in. This is a bug: line numbers should be present for > every line in both buffers. The core of the problem is that jit-lock relies on text-properties, i.e. data shared between the indirect buffers, but is run "per buffer". This can be seen also when you use two indirect buffers in different major modes, where the font-lock behavior can be erratic, mixing the rules of the different major modes. I installed a patch which prevents activation of jit-lock in indirect buffers. In practice this means that nlinum-mode should now work correctly in the base buffer but will not work at all in the indirect buffer. IOW, problem is still present but it fails more cleanly ;-) Stefan