From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r116779: Restore compatibility with legacy comment-start-skip values Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:32:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <53271F7F.8070308@yandex.ru> <5327508B.6020802@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395099178 29192 80.91.229.3 (17 Mar 2014 23:32:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 18 00:33:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPh1l-0007MJ-VV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:33:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60910 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPh1l-00081i-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPh1c-0007xm-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPh1U-0005V9-TP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:27721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPh1U-0005V4-Os for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:32:48 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KKg/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDjhiWYoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+KKg/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgeBsEtkQoDjhiWYoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="52404499" Original-Received: from 206-248-162-160.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.162.160]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Mar 2014 19:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 163B56028B; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:32:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <5327508B.6020802@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:44:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170463 Archived-At: > So the question is, do we raise an error, simply don't move point, or > do something like (skip-syntax-forward "-<")? Let's not worry about it for now. > By the way, we might want to replace all the matching shenanigans with the > last option. That won't work for /*...*/ and many other situations. Stefan